Platten v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
This text of Platten v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Platten v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JANE PLATTEN,
Plaintiff,
and
DEAN HEALTH PLAN,
Involuntary Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-C-1265
SMITH & NEPHEW INC., SMITH & NEPHEW PLC, SMITH & NEPHEW LTD., and ABC INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD
Plaintiff Jane Platten brought this action against a corporation, Smith and Nephew, Inc., and two business entities headquartered in the United Kingdom, Smith & Nephew PLC and Smith & Nephew Ltd. Defendants removed the case from Brown County Circuit Court to this court, asserting federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The court addressed jurisdiction at a September 25, 2020 scheduling conference and was assured by Defendants that each of the United Kingdom business entities was not in fact a citizen of Wisconsin and that complete diversity jurisdiction existed. Defendants, however, have not supplemented the record in any way that substantiates their assertion. The Seventh Circuit has repeatedly emphasized that determining the citizenship of unincorporated foreign business entities first requires analyzing whether the business entity is equivalent to a corporation. See White Pearl Inversiones S.A. (Uruguay) v. Cemusa, Inc., 647 F.3d 684, 686–88 (7th Cir. 2011). In the event the business entity is not equivalent to a corporation, the court must examine the citizenship of the entities’ investors or members. See id. at 686–88; Lear Corp. v. Johnson Elec. Holdings Ltd., 353 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 1993). Based upon the foregoing, unless the record provides an evidentiary basis for the court to
conclude that subject matter jurisdiction exists, the court would have no choice but to remand the action to state court. Defendants will be given the opportunity to supplement the record to establish the facts needed to support their assertion that federal jurisdiction exists under § 1332. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, Defendants must supplement the record by providing evidence sufficient to conclude that there is complete diversity of citizenship among the parties. SO ORDERED at Green Bay, Wisconsin this 12th day of January, 2023. s/ William C. Griesbach William C. Griesbach United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Platten v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platten-v-smith-nephew-inc-wied-2023.