Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

972 F.2d 1362, 297 U.S. App. D.C. 354, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21495, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21152
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided September 11, 1992·No. Nos. 90-1397, 90-1399 to 90-1401 and 90-1504·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and the responses thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG did not participate in this matter. Circuit Judges WALD and BUCKLEY would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 972 F.2d 1362, 297 U.S. App. D.C. 354, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21495, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21152 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

972 F.2d 1362 (Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related