Platt v. State
This text of 827 So. 2d 1064 (Platt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Timothy PLATT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
STRINGER, Judge.
Timothy Platt appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without comment the portion of the trial court's order that denied Platt's request for additional jail credit. The trial court, however, went further in its order and reduced Platt's jail credit from 305 days to 253 days because the trial court believed that the sheriff's jail log contained an error which gave Platt too much jail credit. The trial court erred because rescission of previously awarded jail credit is a sentence enhancement that violates the prohibition against double jeopardy. See Bailey v. State, 777 So.2d *1065 995, 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We, therefore, reverse the portion of the trial court's order that revoked the previously awarded jail credit, and we direct the trial court to reinstate the 305 days' credit.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
827 So. 2d 1064, 2002 WL 31268873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.