Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Platt v. State

Platt v. State

592 So. 2d 1276, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 1992 WL 25821
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1058
StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 1276 (Platt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Platt v. State, 592 So. 2d 1276, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 1992 WL 25821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The restitution hearing which is the subject of this appeal was transcribed by a court reporter who is now deceased. The trial court judge has certified that a reconstructed record cannot be prepared despite good faith efforts to do so. Appellant now moves to reverse for a new restitution hearing pursuant to Odom v. State, 534 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) and the state does not contest this point. Accordingly, this cause is REVERSED and REMANDED for a new restitution hearing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Odom v. State
534 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 1276, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 1992 WL 25821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.