Platt v. State
This text of 551 So. 2d 1277 (Platt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gregg PLATT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. As to the admission of evidence of appellant's involvement in a marijuana transaction, such evidence was admissible as inseparable crime evidence, not subject to the ten day notice provision required under section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1987). Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150, 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), quoting Erhardt, Florida Evidence, § 404.16 at 138 (2d ed. 1984). See also Austin v. State, 500 So.2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The remaining points were not properly preserved to address on appeal.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 So. 2d 1277, 1989 WL 136076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.