Platt v. Platt

106 N.Y.S. 1095
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 19, 1907·Published

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The only issue raised by the pleadings in this action is whether the “plaintiff was married to defendant on or about November 9, 1901, at the Fifth Avenue Hotel, in the city and county of New York.” There is no authority for the submission of this issue to a jury upon this motion, and the practice of submitting any issue.other than that of adultery to a jury in an action of this char[1096]*1096acter has been distinctly disapproved by the Appellate Division of this department. Bush v. Bush, 103 App. Div. 588, 93 N. Y. Supp. 159; Packard v. Packard, 88 App. Div. 339, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1090; Wilcox v. Wilcox, 116 App. Div. 423, 101 N. Y. Supp. 828.

Motion denied. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Platt v. Platt, 106 N.Y.S. 1095 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

106 N.Y.S. 1095 (Platt v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Packard v. Packard
88 A.D. 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Bush v. Bush
103 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Wilcox v. Wilcox
116 A.D. 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Packard v. Packard
84 N.Y.S. 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Bush v. Bush
93 N.Y.S. 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)