Platt v. Platt
58 N.Y. 646
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Church, Ch. J., not voting.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Platt v. Platt, 58 N.Y. 646 (N.Y. 1874).
58 N.Y. 646 (Platt v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bennett v. Meeker
202 P. 203 (Montana Supreme Court, 1921)
MacMullan v. Kelly
127 P. 819 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
State v. Murphy
83 N.W. 991 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Hamilton v. Dooly
49 P. 769 (Utah Supreme Court, 1897)
Pryor v. McIntire
7 App. D.C. 417 (D.C. Circuit, 1895)
Munroe v. Tousey
13 N.Y.S. 79 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Vilas v. Plattsburgh & Montreal Railroad
123 N.Y. 440 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Brush v. Manhattan Railway Co.
13 N.Y.S. 908 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890)
Maicas v. Leony
22 Abb. N. Cas. 465 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)
Dole v. Belden
1 N.Y.S. 667 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Jerrett v. Mahan
17 P. 12 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1888)
Platt v. . Platt
12 N.E. 22 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)