Home/Supreme Court/Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

382 U.S. 456, 86 S. Ct. 643, 15 L. Ed. 2d 522, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2975, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,668
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 31, 1966
Docket274
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 456 (Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 382 U.S. 456, 86 S. Ct. 643, 15 L. Ed. 2d 522, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2975, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,668 (1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness filed by the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the mandamus proceeding as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Daewoo Indus. Co., Ltd.
591 F. Supp. 157 (D. Oregon, 1984)
The Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of South Carolina, Lexington County, the State Board of Pharmaceutical Examiners, Board of Medical Examiners, United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of Wyoming, the Wyoming State Board of Pharmacy, the Wyoming State Board of Medical Examiners, and the Department of Health and Social Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Joseph A. Califano, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
582 F.2d 849 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Weisbrod v. Lynn
383 F. Supp. 933 (District of Columbia, 1974)
Whitney Stores, Inc. v. Summerford
280 F. Supp. 406 (D. South Carolina, 1968)
A. Olinick & Sons v. Dempster Bros.
365 F.2d 439 (Second Circuit, 1966)
A. Olinick & Sons, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Dempster Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. A. Olinick & Sons v. Honorable Matthew T. Abruzzo, United States District Judge, Eastern District of New York
365 F.2d 439 (Second Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 456, 86 S. Ct. 643, 15 L. Ed. 2d 522, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2975, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-minnesota-mining-manufacturing-co-scotus-1966.