Platt v. Mannheimer

149 So. 2d 538
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 23, 1963·No. No. 31699·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Argument having been heard and upon further consideration, it appearing that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued, such writ is accordingly discharged, charged.

TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J. and HOBSON (Ret.), J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Platt v. Mannheimer, 149 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1963).

149 So. 2d 538 (Platt v. Mannheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kanter v. Safran
68 So. 2d 553 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Mangus v. Present
135 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Ansin v. Thurston
101 So. 2d 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Stenor, Inc. v. Lester
58 So. 2d 673 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bell
116 So. 2d 617 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota
122 So. 2d 611 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Smith v. Navarro
69 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Dupont Plaza, Inc. v. Dade County
125 So. 2d 564 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)