Platt v. Hook

Superior Court of Delaware

Platt v. Hook

5 Del. 352

DecidedJuly 5, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Del. 352 (Platt v. Hook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Platt v. Hook, 5 Del. 352 (Del. Ct. App. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

*353 Mr. Gordon moved to affirm the judgment, on the ground that no exceptions were filed. The statement on the face of the exceptions that the defendant appears and files exceptions is nothing, without a signature, as it is not the act of any one, either to bind him, or to require that it should be noticed by the other party, without signature.

The motion was resisted by Mr. Johnson, (who however, did not file the exceptions,) but the court affirmed the judgment, on the ground taken.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*353 Mr. Gordon moved to affirm the judgment, on the ground that no exceptions were filed. The statement on the face of the exceptions that the defendant appears and files exceptions is nothing, without a signature, as it is not the act of any one, either to bind him, or to require that it should be noticed by the other party, without signature.

The motion was resisted by Mr. Johnson, (who however, did not file the exceptions,) but the court affirmed the judgment, on the ground taken.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Del. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/platt-v-hook-delsuperct-1851.