Platt v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Platt v. Hertz Corp.

66 Misc. 2d 505, 321 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 66 Misc. 2d 505 (Platt v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Platt v. Hertz Corp., 66 Misc. 2d 505, 321 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff has failed to show that defendant Hertz gave its express or implied permission to defendant Messina to drive the truck. Defendant may validly restrict the operation of its vehicle by an unlicensed driver pursuant to the terms of its written rental agreement signed by the lessee. (Burmaster v. State of New York, 7 N Y 2d 65, 70.)

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur — Gold, J. P., Quran and Lupiano, JJ.

Order reversed,, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI