Plato v. Merit Systems Protection Board

126 F. App'x 958
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 11, 2005·No. 2004-3246·Unpublished

Opinion

*959 PER CURIAM.

Aristides Plato (“Plato”) appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction. Plato v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., DC-0831-02-0672-1-1 (MSPB July 7, 2002). We affirm.

The board issued a show cause order to Plato requesting that he provide proof that the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) had issued a final decision in his case, a prerequisite to board jurisdiction. See 5 U.S.C. § 8347(d)(1) (2000); 5 C.F.R. §§ 831.109 to .110 (2004). Plato did not respond to this order and failed otherwise to offer proof that OPM had issued a final decision. See Minor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 819 F.2d 280, 282 (Fed.Cir.1987) (noting that petitioner has the burden of showing jurisdiction). Therefore, the board was correct to dismiss Plato’s case for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plato v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 126 F. App'x 958 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

126 F. App'x 958 (Plato v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vivien L. Minor v. Merit Systems Protection Board
819 F.2d 280 (Federal Circuit, 1987)