Platner v. Best
11 Johns. 530
Opinion
The substantial justice of this case would appear to be with the judgment. But it cannot be supported, without a violation of a settled rule of law. The cause of action has once been tried, and it would be a dangerous principle to allow a judgment to be opened and the cause of action again tried, by another justice, on the ground of a mistake in the former trial. If such mistake was made, it cannot be corrected in this way. The judgment must accordingly be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Platner v. Best, 11 Johns. 530 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).
11 Johns. 530 (Platner v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitaker v. Bramson
29 F. Cas. 947 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1855)
Hatch v. Benton
6 Barb. 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Crockett v. Routon
1 Dudley Rep. 254 (Heard County Superior Court, Ga., 1833)