Plater v. State

211 A.2d 710, 239 Md. 691, 1965 Md. LEXIS 596
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 25, 1965·No. No. 327·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant was indicted and convicted under Code (1957), Article 27, Section 490, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by a judge, sitting without a jury.

[692] The sole question for determination is whether appellant was apprehended under circumstances from which “an intent [by-appellant] may be presumed [that he intended] feloniously to break and enter into any dwelling house.”

We have carefully examined the evidence adduced by the State below—the appellant offered1 none—and hold that it was ample to support the finding of the trial court. Bergen v. State, 234 Md. 394; Wright v. State, 222 Md. 242; Martin v. State, 203 Md. 66.

Court-appointed counsel for the appellant made an earnest and sincere effort to obtain a reversal of his client’s conviction, but, because of the State’s evidence, appellant’s appeal was hopeless.

Judgment and sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plater v. State, 211 A.2d 710, 239 Md. 691, 1965 Md. LEXIS 596 (Md. 1965).

211 A.2d 710 (Plater v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
159 A.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)
Bergen v. State
199 A.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Martin v. State
98 A.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)