Plater v. State

211 A.2d 710, 239 Md. 691, 1965 Md. LEXIS 596
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 25, 1965
DocketNo. 327
StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.2d 710 (Plater v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plater v. State, 211 A.2d 710, 239 Md. 691, 1965 Md. LEXIS 596 (Md. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant was indicted and convicted under Code (1957), Article 27, Section 490, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by a judge, sitting without a jury.

[692]*692The sole question for determination is whether appellant was apprehended under circumstances from which “an intent [by-appellant] may be presumed [that he intended] feloniously to break and enter into any dwelling house.”

We have carefully examined the evidence adduced by the State below—the appellant offered1 none—and hold that it was ample to support the finding of the trial court. Bergen v. State, 234 Md. 394; Wright v. State, 222 Md. 242; Martin v. State, 203 Md. 66.

Court-appointed counsel for the appellant made an earnest and sincere effort to obtain a reversal of his client’s conviction, but, because of the State’s evidence, appellant’s appeal was hopeless.

Judgment and sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
159 A.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)
Bergen v. State
199 A.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Martin v. State
98 A.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.2d 710, 239 Md. 691, 1965 Md. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plater-v-state-md-1965.