Plater v. Phoenix Financial Services
This text of Plater v. Phoenix Financial Services (Plater v. Phoenix Financial Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAHEEM LA’MONZE PLATER, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-22-688-J PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. ORDER
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se “Fair Credit Reporting Act Complaint” [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). After screening, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss the Complaint and deny Plaintiff's pending motions as moot. [Doc. No. 11]. Plaintiff did not object and has waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Nelson v. United States, 40 F.4th 1105, 1109 (10th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] and DISMISSESS the Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff’s pending motions [Doc. Nos. 6, 8, 10] are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28" day of November, 2022.
CU 2 mM. BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Plater v. Phoenix Financial Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plater-v-phoenix-financial-services-okwd-2022.