Plata Capital Limited v. Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC; Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC v. Fintech Acquisition Limited

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-02549
StatusUnknown

This text of Plata Capital Limited v. Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC; Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC v. Fintech Acquisition Limited (Plata Capital Limited v. Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC; Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC v. Fintech Acquisition Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plata Capital Limited v. Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC; Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC v. Fintech Acquisition Limited, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

PLATA CAPITAL LIMITED, Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-02549-PAE Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant, Hon, Paul A. Engelmayer - against - FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS L.P. and FTP SECURITIES LLC, Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.

FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS L.P. and FTP SECURITIES LLC, Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, - against - FINTECH ACQUISITION LIMITED, Counterclaim-Defendant.

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, all the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties,” and individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of certain nonpublic and confidential material that will be exchanged pursuant to and during the course of discovery in this case; and WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, the Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Stipulated Protective

Order ("Protective Order")-including without limitation the Paiiies to this action, their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constmctive notice of this Protective Order-shall adhere to the following terms: 1. Any person subject to this Protective Order who receives from any other person subject to this Protective Order any "Discovery Material" (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed pursuant to and in the course of discovery in this action) that is designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order (hereinafter "Confidential Discovery Material") shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 2. The person producing any given Discovery Material or that person's counsel may designate such material as "Confidential," in whole or in part, only if counsel determines reasonably and in good faith that such designation is necessary to protect the interests of the client in information that is proprietary, a trade secret, or otherwise sensitive and non-public financial or business information; that is of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; that is subject to a contractual or other duty of confidentiality owed by the client to a third party; or which the producing party otherwise believes in good faith to be entitled to protection under Rule 26(C)(l )(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including copies, information extracted from protected material, summaries or compilations, and conversations or presentations by the Patiies or their counsel that might reveal Confidential material. Moreover, the person producing any given Discovery Material or that person's counsel may designate such material as "Confidential," in whole or in part, if applicable law-foreign or domestic-requires the equivalent of "Confidential" treatment as set fotih in this Protective Order, examples of which may include, but are not limited to, laws implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the General Data Protection Regulation (including but not limited to the Data Protection Act 2018 (c.12) ("United Kingdom's General Data Protection Regulation")). 3. The person producing any given Discovery Material or that person's counsel may designate such material as "Highly Confidential -Attorneys' Eyes Only," in whole or in part, only if counsel determines reasonably and in good faith that such designation is necessary to protect the interests of the client in proprietary and/or competitively sensitive technical, financial, or other confidential business information, the disclosure of which is likely to cause irreparable harm to an individual or to the business or significantly impair the competitive position of the designating party. The Parties should meet and confer if any produced materials require a designation of "Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only," provided that absent further agreement, such designated materials shall only be disclosed to the individuals or entities expressly enumerated in Section 9 below. 4. The person producing any given Discovery Material may also redact any non-responsive information as to which applicable law-foreign or domestic-requires redaction, such as sensitive personal information that may be protected under the United Kingdom's General Data Protection Regulation. 5. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person's counsel may designate such portion as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential -Attorneys' Eyes Only" by stamping or othe1wise clearly marking as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential -Attorneys' Eyes Only" the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 6. With respect to deposition transcripts and exhibits, and associated recordings of any deposition, a producing person or that person's counsel may designate such portion as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" either by (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony ( consisting of question and answer) in a separate volume and mark it as "Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order" or "Highly Confidential Infonnation Governed by Protective Order"; or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within thirty (30) days after each party receives a deposition transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript and/or the specific exhibits that are to be designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential -Attorneys' Eyes Only," in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript or exhibit (as the case may be) in their possession or under their control as directed by the producing person or that person's counsel by the reporter. All depositions shall presumptively be treated as Confidential Discovery Material and subject to this Protective Order during the deposition and for a period of thirty (30) days after a transcript of said deposition is received by counsel for each of the parties. At or before the end of such thirty-day period, the deposition shall be classified appropriately. Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing, or other proceeding to include Confidential Discovery Material so that the other parties can ensure that only authorized individuals, who have signed a Non­ Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto, are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential." Recorded p01iions of any such deposition so designated will likewise be treated by the Parties as Confidential or Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only. Any disputes to such designations shall be resolved pursuant to Section 10 below. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Plata Capital Limited v. Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC; Financial Technology Partners L.P. and FTP Securities LLC v. Fintech Acquisition Limited, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plata-capital-limited-v-financial-technology-partners-lp-and-ftp-nysd-2025.