Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.

232 So. 2d 213, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 3, 1970

DocketNo. 69-584

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 So. 2d 213 (Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp., 232 So. 2d 213, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered for the defendants at the conclusion of a non-jury trial. The single point presented urges that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied plaintiff’s proffer of extrinsic evidence as to the intent of the parties to the contract. The proffer consisted of testimony that the parties intended Philip R. Consolo would be personally liable on a contract.

The decision of the trial court that the contract is not ambiguous and that Consolo was not personally liable is amply supported by the holding in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Wilson, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 761.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered for the defendants at the conclusion of a non-jury trial. The single point presented urges that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied plaintiff’s proffer of extrinsic evidence as to the intent of the parties to the contract. The proffer consisted of testimony that the parties intended Philip R. Consolo would be personally liable on a contract.

The decision of the trial court that the contract is not ambiguous and that Consolo was not personally liable is amply supported by the holding in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Wilson, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 761.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 So. 2d 213, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plastic-dynamics-corp-v-lincoln-investment-corp-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack