Plaster v. Center

184 S.E.2d 364, 124 Ga. App. 503, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 993
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 1, 1971
Docket46485
StatusPublished

This text of 184 S.E.2d 364 (Plaster v. Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plaster v. Center, 184 S.E.2d 364, 124 Ga. App. 503, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 993 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

Mrs. Euphie D. Center sued Clarke E. Plaster for damages arising out of a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and a tractor driven by defendant’s agent and employee, W. R. Brown, for the sum of $900. The proximate cause of the collision is alleged to be the negligence of the defendant’s servant while acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the collision. Plaster, in his answer, denied the claim but admitted the collision and sought damages for his tractor in the sum of $1,750. On the call of the case for trial, the defendant filed an affirmative plea of res judicata alleging that [504]*504the plaintiff had already sued his servant, W. R. Brown, in another court and had obtained a judgment for $750 damages "on the same cause of action . . . asserted against this defendant,” that her cause of action has merged in a judgment and since she can have only one cause of action for one injury, her present complaint is already adjudicated and should be dismissed as to the defendant. Attached to the plea were the pleadings in the former suit. The jury returned a verdict in that case against the defendant Brown for $750. On May 10, 1971, after the submission of evidence and argument by counsel, the plea of res judicata was denied. On the same date the case proceeded to trial before a jury, which returned a verdict for $500, and judgment was entered thereon. The appeal is from the order denying and overruling defendant’s plea of res judicata and the only error enumerated is on the court’s ruling on this plea. Held:

Submitted September 14, 1971 Decided October 1, 1971. Frank M. Gleason, for appellant. Burton Brown, for appellee.

We have here a final judgment rendered against the defendant, Plaster, with no appeal therefrom (the notice of appeal not being to the final judgment, and no error enumerated as to the final judgment). There being a final judgment in this case in the lower court, with no appeal therefrom, the same is final and binding, and we cannot go back of that judgment and review an ancillary ruling thereon even though it was made on the same date. Under the authority of Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (4) (161 SE2d 281) and cases following that case, the law of the case as to the final judgment has been established adversely to the appeal "whether right or wrong . . . until set aside or reversed,” and the sole enumeration of error where based on an ancillary ruling is not meritorious. Indeed, this was the law of Georgia prior to Hill v. Willis, supra. See Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 (1) (195 SE 193) and cases cited on pages 357-358.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Willis
161 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Rabhan v. Rabhan
195 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E.2d 364, 124 Ga. App. 503, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaster-v-center-gactapp-1971.