Plasner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Plasner v. State

497 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2466, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 1986

DocketNo. 84-2009

StatusPublished

This text of 497 So. 2d 1319 (Plasner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plasner v. State, 497 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2466, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant, a prospective purchaser of cannabis from undercover police officers who was arrested in a “reverse-sting” operation, was charged with and convicted of conspiracy to traffic by sale or delivery. While he may well have been guilty of conspiracy by possession or attempted possession, Orantes v. State, 452 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.1984); see Garces v. State, 485 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the information did not allege that offense. On the other hand, Sobrino v. State, 471 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and Garces v. State, 485 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), establish that he did not commit the crime which was stated. We are therefore compelled to reverse the conviction with directions to discharge the defendant.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant, a prospective purchaser of cannabis from undercover police officers who was arrested in a “reverse-sting” operation, was charged with and convicted of conspiracy to traffic by sale or delivery. While he may well have been guilty of conspiracy by possession or attempted possession, Orantes v. State, 452 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.1984); see Garces v. State, 485 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the information did not allege that offense. On the other hand, Sobrino v. State, 471 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and Garces v. State, 485 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), establish that he did not commit the crime which was stated. We are therefore compelled to reverse the conviction with directions to discharge the defendant.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2466, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plasner-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack