Plaskowitz v. Wesker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Plaskowitz v. Wesker

202 A.D. 744

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1922·Published

Opinion

Order modified by striking out “ $25 ” as the costs of the action, and inserting instead “ $10;” and as so modified affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Taishoff v. Elkema (171 App. Div. 288, 295) and Dahm v. O’Connell (179 id. 363), with leave to plaintiS to serve an amended complaint upon payment of the costs stated in the order appealed from as so modified. Present — Clarke, P. J., Smith, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out “ $25 ” as the costs of the action, and inserting instead “ $10;” and as so modified affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Taishoff v. Elkema (171 App. Div. 288, 295) and Dahm v. O’Connell (179 id. 363), with leave to plaintiS to serve an amended complaint upon payment of the costs stated in the order appealed from as so modified. Present — Clarke, P. J., Smith, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.

Plaskowitz v. Wesker, 202 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

202 A.D. 744 (Plaskowitz v. Wesker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related