Plaquemines Parish Government v. State

826 So. 2d 14, 2002 WL 1000690
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 10, 2002
Docket2001-CA-1027, 2001-CA-1028
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 826 So. 2d 14 (Plaquemines Parish Government v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plaquemines Parish Government v. State, 826 So. 2d 14, 2002 WL 1000690 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

826 So.2d 14 (2002)

PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT
v.
STATE of Louisiana and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., et al.
v.
State of Louisiana, Plaquemines Parish Government, et al.

Nos. 2001-CA-1027, 2001-CA-1028.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 10, 2002.
Rehearing Denied May 15, 2002.
Writ Denied September 13, 2002.

*17 L.V. Cooley, IV, Special Assistant Parish Attorney, Plaquemines Parish Government, Belle Chasse, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Plaquemine Parish Government.

Thomas F. Gardner, Mary Ann Darr Wegmann, Roger C. Linde, Douglas A. Kewley, Gardner & Kewley, Metairie, LA, for Appellees, Lobrano Interests.

Robert E. Tarcza, Tarcza & Gelderman, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Appellees, Chauvin Interest.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, E. Kay Kirkpatrick, Gary L. Keyser, Isaac Jackson, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General for the State of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, and Patrick S. Ottinger, Special Assistant Attorney General, Ottinger, Hebert, Sikes & Hebert, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, State of Louisiana.

(Court composed of Judge JAMES F. McKAY, III, Judge DENNIS R. BAGNERIS, SR., Judge MAX N. TOBIAS, JR).

McKAY, Judge.

By Act No. 18 of 1894, Act No. 205 of 1910, and Act No. 324 of 1938 as amended, the State of Louisiana created the Buras Levee District (BLD) and provided for the transfer to its Board of Commissioners of all lands belonging to the State within the geographic limits of the BLD. These lands included a tract of land located within the fractional Section 20, Township 22 South, Range 30 East, and referred to herein as Tract 87. On June 11, 1938, the BLD granted a mineral lease, which affected Tract 87, to Delta Development Company (Delta).[1] Tract 87 was dry land at the time the mineral lease was granted to Delta; it has since become covered by the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. In 1956, Delta subleased the area to H.R. Cullen. On August 16, 1957, the State granted mineral lease No. 3263, which included Tract 87, directly to British American Oil Producing Company and Douglas B. Marshall. At all relevant times, there has been oil and gas production attributable to Tract 87.[2] Chevron is now the operator of both leases.

On April 15, 1975, the Board of Commissioners of the BLD was consolidated and merged into the Plaquemines Parish Government (PPG). As a result of this consolidation and merger, all properties of the BLD were transferred to its successor entity, PPG.

On April 17, 1990, PPG filed a petition for declaratory judgment asking the trial court to declare it to be owner of Tract 87, *18 owner of all future revenues derived from Tract 87 and for an order requiring Chevron to pay it all revenues held in suspense and all future revenues derived from Tract 87 attributable to PPG's recorded interest in Tract 87. On June 29, 1990, Chevron filed a petition in concursus contending that both the Cullen sublease and State Lease No. 3263 cover a tract of land (Tract 87) that is claimed by both the PPG and the State, and as such it was uncertain as to whom it should pay royalties for production attributable to Tract 87. Chevron deposited $1,374,628 into the Registry of the Court on the day it filed the concursus and has deposited additional sums since.

On September 6, 1990, the trial court consolidated PPG's petition and Chevron's concursus. On September 13, 2000, the trial court denied the State's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, motion in limine. On September 26, 2000, immediately prior to trial on the merits, the trial court denied the State's peremptory exception of no right of action. At trial, during the cross-examination of PPG's only witness to testify, PPG's attorney conceded that it was not seeking ownership of the water bottoms of Tract 87, but was seeking only ownership of the mineral rights. The State then moved for a judgment on the pleadings, which the trial court denied. The trial court then on its own motion proceeded to grant judgment in favor of PPG, recognizing the continuing validity of the BLD lease. The State now appeals.

On appeal, the State raises the following assignments of error: 1) the trial court erred in its denial of the State's peremptory exception raising the objection of no right of action and in its ruling that PPG obtained ownership of certain minerals affecting Tract 87 when the BLD merged and consolidated into PPG; 2) the trial court erred in its denial of the State's motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, motion in limine, seeking the judicial declaration that La. R.S. 9:1151, the "Freeze Statute," did not apply to the facts of this case; 3) the trial court erred in applying La. R.S. 9:1152, a statute which no party pled and which cannot be constitutionally applied to the facts and circumstances of this case; 4) the trial court erred in its dismissal of the case on the State's motion for judgment on the pleadings, based upon PPG's judicial confession, and in its denial of the State's opportunity to put on evidence; and 5) the trial court erred in rendering its judgment without a proper description of Tract 87.

Assignment of Error No. 1

The objection of no right of action tests whether the plaintiff has a "real and actual interest" in the suit. Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 885, 888. Stated another way, an exception of no right of action determines "whether the plaintiff belongs to the particular class to which the law grants a remedy for the particular harm alleged." Ferguson v. Dirks, 95-560 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/28/95), 665 So.2d 585, 587. The exception is appropriate when the plaintiff does not have an interest in the subject matter of the suit or legal capacity to proceed with suit in a particular case. Gorum v. Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n Employee Ben. Trust, 95-468 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/95), 664 So.2d 662, 664.

In the instant case, it is undisputed that the State conveyed Tract 87 and other lands to the BLD by an instrument dated September 9, 1938. In 1943, the Louisiana Supreme Court declared the September 9, 1938 conveyance instrument to be a valid and constitutional conveyance from the State to the BLD. State v. Gulf Refining Co., 202 La. 951, 13 So.2d 277 (1943). In that case, the State brought suit against *19 the BLD and others contending that the transfer by the State Auditor and the Register of the State Land Office was null on the ground that the land was below the southern boundary of the BLD and hence there was no authority for the transfer. The lower court rejected the State's contention and the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's ruling. The 1938 conveyance from the State was supplemented in 1954. The purpose of this 1954 supplemental conveyance was to show the correct location of the lands conveyed in 1938 in accordance with an official survey map approved by the Register of the State Land Office on October 18, 1940. After describing the lands covered in the September 9, 1938 conveyance, the 1954 supplemental conveyance provides as follows:

All of the above lands, sections and townships are in accordance with the official map of T. 22 S. Rs. 30 & 31 E. and T. 23 S. Rs. 30 & 31 E., South Eastern District, West of River, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, made under the authority of the Register of the State Land Office, as provided by Act No. 232 of 1934, dated November, 1939, Jno. C. deArmas, Jr., Reg. C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chevron USA, Inc. v. State
993 So. 2d 187 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2008)
Chevron USA, Inc. v. State
972 So. 2d 363 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
Baudin v. Spruill
931 So. 2d 549 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
Mendonca v. Tidewater Inc.
862 So. 2d 505 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 So. 2d 14, 2002 WL 1000690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaquemines-parish-government-v-state-lactapp-2002.