Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 724 F.3d 1343
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 31, 2012·No. 2012-1355·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-1355 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 10/31/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mniteb $>tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ALIPH, INC. AND ALIPHCOM, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1355

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 09-CV-1714, Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Plantronics, Inc. moves without opposition for a 45- day extension of time, until December 10, 2012, to file its reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-1355 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 10/31/2012

PLANTRONICS, INC. V. ALIPH, INC. 2

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc. (Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.