Plantin v. All City Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Plantin v. All City Insurance

290 A.D.2d 327, 735 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 327 (Plantin v. All City Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plantin v. All City Insurance, 290 A.D.2d 327, 735 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about March 4, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[328]*328Plaintiff, pro se, admits that a prior action she brought against defendant in Civil Court, Kings County, was based on the same allegations she makes herein, but asserts that such action was dismissed on the ground that the Civil Court, Kings County, was the “wrong court.” The “Decision and Judgment” entered in the Kings County action indicates only that the action was dismissed after a trial held on July 1, 1998. Since such decision and judgment does not specify that the dismissal was not on the merits, we reject plaintiff’s claim to that effect (CPLR 5013), and, accordingly, conclude that res judicata was properly applied to bar the instant action (see, Ryan v New York Tel. Co., 62 NY2d 494, 500). Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about March 4, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[328]*328Plaintiff, pro se, admits that a prior action she brought against defendant in Civil Court, Kings County, was based on the same allegations she makes herein, but asserts that such action was dismissed on the ground that the Civil Court, Kings County, was the “wrong court.” The “Decision and Judgment” entered in the Kings County action indicates only that the action was dismissed after a trial held on July 1, 1998. Since such decision and judgment does not specify that the dismissal was not on the merits, we reject plaintiff’s claim to that effect (CPLR 5013), and, accordingly, conclude that res judicata was properly applied to bar the instant action (see, Ryan v New York Tel. Co., 62 NY2d 494, 500). Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 327, 735 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plantin-v-all-city-insurance-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack