Planters Fertilizer Co. v. Smith
This text of 93 S.E. 1018 (Planters Fertilizer Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The making of an oral motion for a new trial in the municipal court of the city of Macon, as provided for by the act of 1913 (Georgia Laws, 1913, p. 252), is a cumulative remedy, and does not defeat the right of certiorari. Johnson v. James, 19 Ga. App. 118 (91 S. E. 220).
2. Eor none of the reasons assigned was it proper to dismiss the writ of certiorari without hearing the merits of the same as shown by the petition and the answer.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 1018, 21 Ga. App. 167, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/planters-fertilizer-co-v-smith-gactapp-1917.