Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.

110 So. 883, 162 La. 630, 1926 La. LEXIS 2299

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 29, 1926

DocketNo. 28152.

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 883 (Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 110 So. 883, 162 La. 630, 1926 La. LEXIS 2299 (La. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is the suit referred to in the decision handed down to-day in the case of Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York (No. 28170) 110 So. 880. 1 The cases are alike in every respect. For the reasons given in the other case:

The judgment complained of in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the Court of Appeal to be decided according to the opinion rendered in the case entitled Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, No. 28170. The costs of the proceedings had in the Supreme Court are to be paid by the defendant. The liability of either party for other court costs is to be determined by the final judgment.

ST. PAUL, J„ dissents. THOMPSON, J., dissents in remanding the case, but otherwise concurs.

1

Ante, p. 620.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is the suit referred to in the decision handed down to-day in the case of Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York (No. 28170) 110 So. 880. 1 The cases are alike in every respect. For the reasons given in the other case:

The judgment complained of in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the Court of Appeal to be decided according to the opinion rendered in the case entitled Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, No. 28170. The costs of the proceedings had in the Supreme Court are to be paid by the defendant. The liability of either party for other court costs is to be determined by the final judgment.

ST. PAUL, J„ dissents. THOMPSON, J., dissents in remanding the case, but otherwise concurs.

1

Ante, p. 620.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 883, 162 La. 630, 1926 La. LEXIS 2299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/planters-bank-trust-co-v-mutual-life-ins-co-la-1926.