Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.

110 So. 883, 162 La. 630, 1926 La. LEXIS 2299
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 29, 1926·No. No. 28152.·Published

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

This is the suit referred to in the decision handed down to-day in the case of Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York (No. 28170) 110 So. 880. 1 The cases are alike in every respect. For the reasons given in the other case:

The judgment complained of in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the Court of Appeal to be decided according to the opinion rendered in the case entitled Marie S. Fisette v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, No. 28170. The costs of the proceedings had in the Supreme Court are to be paid by the defendant. The liability of either party for other court costs is to be determined by the final judgment.

ST. PAUL, J„ dissents. THOMPSON, J., dissents in remanding the case, but otherwise concurs.
1

Ante, p. 620.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 110 So. 883, 162 La. 630, 1926 La. LEXIS 2299 (La. 1926).

110 So. 883 (Planters' Bank Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.