Plantada v. Padron

595 So. 2d 580, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1992 WL 55262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1992
DocketNo. 92-158
StatusPublished

This text of 595 So. 2d 580 (Plantada v. Padron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plantada v. Padron, 595 So. 2d 580, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1992 WL 55262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., 267 So.2d 325 (Fla.1972); Diners Club, Inc. v. Brachvogel, 395 So.2d 1156 (Fla.1980); Shafey v. Tease, 332 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); County Nat. Bank of North [581]*581Miami Beach v. Sheridan, Inc., 403 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CTY. NAT. BANK OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH v. Sheridan, Inc.
403 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Shafey v. Tease
332 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Diners Club, Inc. v. Brachvogel
395 So. 2d 1156 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Farish v. Lum's, Inc.
267 So. 2d 325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 580, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1992 WL 55262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plantada-v-padron-fladistctapp-1992.