Plantada v. Padron

595 So. 2d 580, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1992 WL 55262
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1992·No. No. 92-158·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., 267 So.2d 325 (Fla.1972); Diners Club, Inc. v. Brachvogel, 395 So.2d 1156 (Fla.1980); Shafey v. Tease, 332 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); County Nat. Bank of North [581] Miami Beach v. Sheridan, Inc., 403 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plantada v. Padron, 595 So. 2d 580, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1992 WL 55262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 580 (Plantada v. Padron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CTY. NAT. BANK OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH v. Sheridan, Inc.
403 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Shafey v. Tease
332 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Diners Club, Inc. v. Brachvogel
395 So. 2d 1156 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Farish v. Lum's, Inc.
267 So. 2d 325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)