Plant v. Plant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Plant v. Plant

377 So. 2d 249, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16151

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1979

DocketNo. 79-379

StatusPublished

This text of 377 So. 2d 249 (Plant v. Plant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plant v. Plant, 377 So. 2d 249, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amended final judgment entered in this marriage dissolution action, from which the present appeal and cross appeal are taken, is affirmed upon a holding that (a) all the provisions of the amended final judgment, including the child support award, which are attacked on the main appeal are supported by substantial evidence which this court has no authority to upset, and (b) the trial court’s denial of attorneys fees and other relief which are attacked on the cross appeal [none of which, in our view, was stipulated to by the parties] is also supported by competent evidence which this court has no authority to upset. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); see also Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So.2d 672 (Fla.1979) adopting 352 So.2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (Hubbart, J., dissenting); Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The amended final judgment entered in this marriage dissolution action, from which the present appeal and cross appeal are taken, is affirmed upon a holding that (a) all the provisions of the amended final judgment, including the child support award, which are attacked on the main appeal are supported by substantial evidence which this court has no authority to upset, and (b) the trial court’s denial of attorneys fees and other relief which are attacked on the cross appeal [none of which, in our view, was stipulated to by the parties] is also supported by competent evidence which this court has no authority to upset. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); see also Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So.2d 672 (Fla.1979) adopting 352 So.2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (Hubbart, J., dissenting); Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 So. 2d 249, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plant-v-plant-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack