Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Renner & Elder

Ohio Supreme Court

Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Renner & Elder

76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 26, 1907

DocketNo. 10133

StatusPublished

This text of 76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587 (Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Renner & Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Renner & Elder, 76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587 (Ohio 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed, for error in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas of said Franklin county. And this court proceeding to render the judgment said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered that the judgment of the said court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed, and the verdict set aside for error in overruling the motion for a new trial on the ground that the court erred, in refusing to charge the jury as requested by the defendant in its first and third special requests, and that this cause is remanded to said court for further proceedings according to law.

[588]*588Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed, for error in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas of said Franklin county. And this court proceeding to render the judgment said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered that the judgment of the said court of common pleas be, and the same hereby is, reversed, and the verdict set aside for error in overruling the motion for a new trial on the ground that the court erred, in refusing to charge the jury as requested by the defendant in its first and third special requests, and that this cause is remanded to said court for further proceedings according to law.

[588]*588Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plano-manufacturing-co-v-renner-elder-ohio-1907.