Planned Parenthood v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Planned Parenthood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2025 MT 120
Montana Supreme Court·Decided August 22, 2024·No. DA 24-0147·Unpublished

Opinion

j ORIGINAL 08/22/2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 24-0147

DA 24-0147

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA, and SAMUEL DICKMAN, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v. ORDER

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as FILED

Attorney General, AUG 2 2 2024 Bowen Greenwoop

Defendant and Appellant. Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana

Amy Myrick, ofNew York City, New York, has petitioned for permission to appear pro hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause.

Having reviewed the application and having determined that, as required by our Rules for Admission to the Bar of Montana, Petitioner is currently in good standing with another state jurisdiction in which Petitioner is admitted to the practice of law, Montana counsel listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of Montana, and this is the second appearance of Petitioner and the sixth appearance of Petitioner's firm under the pro hac vice rules, with good cause showing under Rule VI(C), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of Amy Myrick to appear pro hac vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Amy Myrick, to all counsel ofrecord in this appeal, and to the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this 21st day of August 2024.

For the Court,

By

Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Planned Parenthood v. State, (Mo. 2024).

Planned Parenthood v. State (Planned Parenthood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.