Planned Parenthood v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Planned Parenthood v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2022 MT 157
Montana Supreme Court·Decided September 12, 2023·No. DA 23-0272·Unpublished

Opinion

09/12/2023

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 23-0272

DA 23-0272 _________________

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA and PAUL FREDERICK HENKE, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v. ORDER STATE OF MONTANA and AUSTIN KNUDSEN, Attorney General of the State of Montana, in his official capacity, and his agents and successors,

Defendants and Appellants. _________________

Kyla Eastling, of New York City, New York, has petitioned for permission to appear pro hac vice before this Court in the above-entitled cause. Having reviewed the application and having determined that, as required by our Rules for Admission to the Bar of Montana, Petitioner Eastling is currently in good standing with another state jurisdiction in which Eastling is admitted to the practice of law, Montana counsel listed in the application is in good standing with the State Bar of Montana, and this is the first appearance of Petitioner and the sixth appearance of Petitioner’s firm under the pro hac vice rules, with good cause showing under Rule VI(C), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of Kyla Eastling to appear pro hac vice in the above-entitled cause is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Kyla Eastling, to all counsel of record in this appeal, and to the State Bar of Montana.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court September 12 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Planned Parenthood v. State, (Mo. 2023).

Planned Parenthood v. State (Planned Parenthood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.