Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Joel Urmanski
This text of 2025 WI 33 (Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Joel Urmanski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2025 WI 33
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JOEL URMANSKI, ET AL., Respondents.
No. 2024AP330-OA Filed July 2, 2025
The Court entered the following order on this date:
On July 2, 2024, this court granted the petition of petitioners, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin et al., for leave to commence an original action. Given our decision in Kaul v. Urmanski, 2025 WI 32, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W.3d ___, which is also being released on this date, the court has now concluded that this original action should be dismissed. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this original action is dismissed; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions and the proposed stipulation are dismissed as moot. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. V. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
Statement of ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J., with whom REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., joins.
¶1 I agree with the court that this case does not belong before us. The original action petition should not have been granted in the first place, as explained by the dissents to the order granting the original action petition. Planned Parenthood of Wis. v. Urmanski, No. 2024AP330-OA, unpublished order at 5–10 (Wis. July 2, 2024) (Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J., dissenting); id. at 10–12 (Hagedorn, J., dissenting) (order reprinted below).
¶2 Also, it is interesting that the court appears to pick and choose when to provide reasoning for dismissing a case. Sometimes it says nothing. See Van Oudenhoven v. DOJ, 2025 WI 25, ___Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W.3d ___ (per curiam). Other times it explains why the case is being dismissed, such as declaring the case moot.
2 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
3 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
4 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
5 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
6 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
7 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
8 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
9 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
10 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
11 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
12 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
13 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
14 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WIS. v. URMANSKI JUSTICE ZIEGLER Statement
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 WI 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/planned-parenthood-of-wisconsin-v-joel-urmanski-wis-2025.