PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro

526 A.2d 741, 217 N.J. Super. 623

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 21, 1987·Published

Opinion

217 N.J. Super. 623 (1987) 526 A.2d 741

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MAUREEN P. CANNIZZARO, MARY FLYNN. AMANDA FANSLER, JOANNE M. FISHER. JOHN T. HIMHAUSER, MARY GANS, OLIVIA GANS, MONA JONES, ROBERT DOW, MARY KAY SMITH, MONMOUTH COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, SHIELD OF ROSES, AND X.Y., A FICTITIOUS NAME FOR ALL PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS ACTING IN CONCERT WITH THE NAMED DEFENDANTS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 25, 1987. Decided May 21, 1987.

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.

*624 William F. Dowd, argued the cause for individual appellants.

Richard Ansell argued the cause for respondent (Anschelewitz, Barr & Ansell, attorneys, Susan T. Robbins, on the brief).

Traynor & Hogan, for appellant Monmouth County Right to Life Committee filed a brief, no appearance was made on their behalf.

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Selikoff in his opinion reported at 204 N.J. Super. 531 (Ch.Div. 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

217 N.J. Super. 623 (1987) 526 A.2d 741

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MAUREEN P. CANNIZZARO, MARY FLYNN. AMANDA FANSLER, JOANNE M. FISHER. JOHN T. HIMHAUSER, MARY GANS, OLIVIA GANS, MONA JONES, ROBERT DOW, MARY KAY SMITH, MONMOUTH COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, SHIELD OF ROSES, AND X.Y., A FICTITIOUS NAME FOR ALL PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS ACTING IN CONCERT WITH THE NAMED DEFENDANTS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 25, 1987. Decided May 21, 1987.

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.

*624 William F. Dowd, argued the cause for individual appellants.

Richard Ansell argued the cause for respondent (Anschelewitz, Barr & Ansell, attorneys, Susan T. Robbins, on the brief).

Traynor & Hogan, for appellant Monmouth County Right to Life Committee filed a brief, no appearance was made on their behalf.

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Selikoff in his opinion reported at 204 N.J. Super. 531 (Ch.Div. 1985).

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro, 526 A.2d 741, 217 N.J. Super. 623 (N.J. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

526 A.2d 741 (PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related