PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro
This text of 526 A.2d 741 (PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH CTY., INC. v. Cannizzaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MAUREEN P. CANNIZZARO, MARY FLYNN. AMANDA FANSLER, JOANNE M. FISHER. JOHN T. HIMHAUSER, MARY GANS, OLIVIA GANS, MONA JONES, ROBERT DOW, MARY KAY SMITH, MONMOUTH COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, SHIELD OF ROSES, AND X.Y., A FICTITIOUS NAME FOR ALL PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS ACTING IN CONCERT WITH THE NAMED DEFENDANTS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.
*624 William F. Dowd, argued the cause for individual appellants.
Richard Ansell argued the cause for respondent (Anschelewitz, Barr & Ansell, attorneys, Susan T. Robbins, on the brief).
Traynor & Hogan, for appellant Monmouth County Right to Life Committee filed a brief, no appearance was made on their behalf.
PER CURIAM
The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Selikoff in his opinion reported at 204 N.J. Super. 531 (Ch.Div. 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
526 A.2d 741, 217 N.J. Super. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/planned-parenthood-of-monmouth-cty-inc-v-cannizzaro-njsuperctappdiv-1987.