Plankinton v. Nye County

Nevada Supreme Court

Plankinton v. Nye County

588 P.2d 1025, 95 Nev. 12, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 516

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 12, 1979

Docket9712

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 588 P.2d 1025 (Plankinton v. Nye County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plankinton v. Nye County, 588 P.2d 1025, 95 Nev. 12, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 516 (Neb. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that he was precluded from raising the issue of irregularities in the creation of the unincorporated town of Pahrump in this action in order to enjoin the enforcement of a township ordinance. Appellant has cited no relevant authority in support of his contention. Since error has not been affirmatively demonstrated, the judgment is affirmed. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that he was precluded from raising the issue of irregularities in the creation of the unincorporated town of Pahrump in this action in order to enjoin the enforcement of a township ordinance. Appellant has cited no relevant authority in support of his contention. Since error has not been affirmatively demonstrated, the judgment is affirmed. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 P.2d 1025, 95 Nev. 12, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plankinton-v-nye-county-nev-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack