Plank v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Plank v. State

306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 308, 2010 WL 933736

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketED 92934

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 196 (Plank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plank v. State, 306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 308, 2010 WL 933736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Plank (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County denying, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on finding of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Plank (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County denying, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on finding of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 308, 2010 WL 933736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plank-v-state-moctapp-2010.