Plank v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Company
60 N.Y. 607, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 220
This text of 60 N.Y. 607 (Plank v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Plank v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, 60 N.Y. 607, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 220 (N.Y. 1875).
Opinion
Per Curiam opinion for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur; except FOLGER and ALLEN, JJ., not voting.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly. *Page 609
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
French v. W. W. Mertz Co.
163 A. 457 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1932)
Maue v. . Erie Railroad Co.
91 N.E. 629 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Miller v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
95 N.W. 718 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Maydole v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
15 Colo. App. 449 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1900)
Disano v. New England Steam Brick Co.
40 A. 7 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1898)
Millen v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
20 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Dewey v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milawaukee Railway Co.
56 N.W. 756 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Harker v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.
55 N.W. 316 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)
Overby v. Chesapeake & Ohio R'y Co.
16 S.E. 813 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1893)
Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
51 N.W. 645 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)
Finnell v. Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad
3 Silv. Ct. App. 643 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hannah v. Connecticut River Railroad
28 N.E. 682 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Smith v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
11 N.Y.S. 586 (Superior Court of New York, 1890)
Smith v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
26 Jones & S. 284 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1890)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Higgins
14 S.W. 653 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1890)
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Burandt
37 Ill. App. 165 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Seley v. Southern Pacific Co.
6 Utah 319 (Utah Supreme Court, 1890)
Fredenburg v. Northern Central Railway Co.
21 N.E. 1049 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Murtaugh v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.
3 N.Y.S. 483 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 430 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 N.Y. 607, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plank-v-ny-central-and-hudson-river-railroad-company-ny-1875.