Planes v. Planes

477 So. 2d 42, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1985·No. 84-2702·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

477 So.2d 42 (1985)

William Peter PLANES, Appellant,
v.
Marianthi PLANES a/K/a Marianne Planes, Appellee.

No. 84-2702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 22, 1985.

Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Koeppel and William T. Goran, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the attorney's fee award under review upon a holding that the trial court had jurisdiction and the wife was entitled to an award of attorney's fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1983), for her attorney's services which were rendered to enforce a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which incorporated a settlement agreement where the husband was in continuous violation of the agreement. See Ettinger v. Ettinger, 242 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). We reach this holding notwithstanding a footnote in the agreement in which the wife purports to waive, except as provided therein, "any and all claims that she now has, or may ever have, to alimony, suit money, and attorney's fees." First, the husband raises this provision for the first time on appeal. See Abrams v. Paul, 453 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Second, even if properly raised, the provision would not prevent an award of fees under section 61.16 in these *43 proceedings to enforce the husband's obligations under the agreement. See Barreiro v. Barreiro, 411 So.2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Third, enforcement of the provision in the present proceedings would clearly be inequitable. See Blanton v. Blanton, 413 So.2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Finally, we find the amount awarded was reasonable under the circumstances and is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Lee v. Lee, 262 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). See also Molne v. Keyes Co., 357 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA) (the appellant, having tendered no counteraffidavits in the trial court on the issue of attorney's fees, may not question the reasonableness of the fees on appeal), cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Planes v. Planes, 477 So. 2d 42, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

477 So. 2d 42 (Planes v. Planes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ANDREA L. LAUX v. KENNETH A. LAUX
266 So. 3d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Walsh v. Walsh
262 So. 3d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Remington v. Remington
711 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Spano v. Spano
698 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Hernandez v. Hernandez
645 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Steinfeld v. Steinfeld
565 So. 2d 366 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Thornton v. Byrnes
537 So. 2d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Meloan v. Coverdale
525 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Warnhoff v. Warnhoff
493 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Dubreuil v. Dubreuil
489 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Levy v. Levy
483 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)