Plambeck ex rel. Plambeck v. Gifford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Plambeck ex rel. Plambeck v. Gifford

193 S.W.3d 839, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 858

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2006·No. No. ED 86670·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bill Gifford (“Gifford”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Richard C. Bresnahan presiding, denying Gifford’s motion to abate child support and granting Respondent’s motion for contempt against Gifford.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bill Gifford (“Gifford”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Richard C. Bresnahan presiding, denying Gifford’s motion to abate child support and granting Respondent’s motion for contempt against Gifford.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Plambeck ex rel. Plambeck v. Gifford, 193 S.W.3d 839, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

193 S.W.3d 839 (Plambeck ex rel. Plambeck v. Gifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.