Plam Beach Tire Co., Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Plam Beach Tire Co., Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.

155 So. 754, 115 Fla. 621, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1650

DecidedJune 25, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 754 (Plam Beach Tire Co., Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plam Beach Tire Co., Inc. v. Sun Oil Co., 155 So. 754, 115 Fla. 621, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1650 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this case the Court is advised by attorneys of record that the entire controversy between the *622 parties has been settled. Therefore, the questions involved have become moot.

Counsel for defendant in error asks that the Court render a written opinion enunciating the law on the questions presented by the cross writ of error. Before those questions could become material the Court should first determine that the main judgment should be affirmed. If the entire controversy has been settled between the parties there is nothing for this Court to determine.

As there is writ of error and cross writ of error both will be dismissed and the costs taxed equally against the parties without prejudice as to the enforcement of -any agreement which may have been entered into between the parties. It is so ordered.

Davis’, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI