Plaisance v. Social Security Administration

W.D. Louisiana

Plaisance v. Social Security Administration

DecidedJune 25, 2019

Docket6:18-cv-00033

StatusUnknown

This text of Plaisance v. Social Security Administration (Plaisance v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plaisance v. Social Security Administration, (W.D. La. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION MARK ANTHONY PLAISANCE CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18-cv-00033 VERSUS JUDGE JAMES U.S. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA SECURITY ADMINISTRATION JUDGMENT This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)! with instructions that the claimant’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income be granted and for computation and payment of an award of benefits beginning on April 21, 2009. Signed this 25th day of June, 2019. 6ObuT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

‘A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5" Cir. 1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION MARK ANTHONY PLAISANCE CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18-cv-00033 VERSUS JUDGE JAMES U.S. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA SECURITY ADMINISTRATION JUDGMENT This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)! with instructions that the claimant’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income be granted and for computation and payment of an award of benefits beginning on April 21, 2009. Signed this 25th day of June, 2019. 6ObuT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

‘A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5" Cir. 1993).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Plaisance v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaisance-v-social-security-administration-lawd-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack