Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

473 N.E.2d 29, 63 N.Y.2d 921, 483 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4720

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 473 N.E.2d 29 (Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education, 473 N.E.2d 29, 63 N.Y.2d 921, 483 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4720 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Measurement of the 30 to 90 days time period within which payroll deductions may be taken does not commence until the employees concerned have been notified individually of the determination that they have committed a violation. (Matter of King v Carey, 57 NY2d 505, 514; Civil Service Law, § 210, subd 2, pars [d], [e], [f].) The decision in Matter of De Lury v Beame (49 NY2d 155) is not to be construed inconsistently with this statutory requirement.

[923]*923Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI