PlainsCapital Bank v. Ricardo Diaz Miranda

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 15, 2018
Docket13-16-00210-CV
StatusPublished

This text of PlainsCapital Bank v. Ricardo Diaz Miranda (PlainsCapital Bank v. Ricardo Diaz Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PlainsCapital Bank v. Ricardo Diaz Miranda, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00210-CV

PLAINSCAPITAL BANK v. RICARDO DIAZ MIRANDA

On Appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-6048-13-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment that

that PlainsCapital is entitled to the following unpaid balances of principal and interest:

(1) $935,107.76 on the Moorefield Note; (2) $4,482,769.13 on the McColl Note; and (3)

$2,146,685.62 on the Cold-Storage Note. We further render that Diaz take nothing in

attorneys' fees. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 15, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PlainsCapital Bank v. Ricardo Diaz Miranda, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plainscapital-bank-v-ricardo-diaz-miranda-texapp-2018.