Plainfield Trust Co. v. McCutcheon

156 A. 376, 108 N.J.L. 201, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 251
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 24, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 156 A. 376 (Plainfield Trust Co. v. McCutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plainfield Trust Co. v. McCutcheon, 156 A. 376, 108 N.J.L. 201, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

*202 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A. 376, 108 N.J.L. 201, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plainfield-trust-co-v-mccutcheon-nj-1931.