Plain ex rel. Plain v. Crosson

532 So. 2d 69, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2324, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568, 1988 WL 105204
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1810
StatusPublished

This text of 532 So. 2d 69 (Plain ex rel. Plain v. Crosson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Plain ex rel. Plain v. Crosson, 532 So. 2d 69, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2324, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568, 1988 WL 105204 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue here is whether jurisdiction over the non-resident defendants exists, pursuant to Section 48.171, Florida Statutes, which requires that the civil action be one “arising out of or by reason of any accident or collision occuring within the state in which the motor vehicle [owned by defendant] is involved.” We cannot say, from our examination of the record, that the civil action pleaded did not meet the [70]*70above statutory test for long-arm jurisdiction.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 So. 2d 69, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2324, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4568, 1988 WL 105204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plain-ex-rel-plain-v-crosson-fladistctapp-1988.