Plahn v. Variel

103 A. 1054, 87 N.J. Eq. 654, 2 Stock. 654, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 476
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 13, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance—Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, I-Ieppenheimlr, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plahn v. Variel, 103 A. 1054, 87 N.J. Eq. 654, 2 Stock. 654, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 476 (N.J. 1917).

103 A. 1054 (Plahn v. Variel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Probate of Fisher
80 A.2d 227 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
In Re Simpson
42 A.2d 873 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1945)
In Re Michelsohn
37 A.2d 118 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1944)
Trust Co. of N.J. v. Spalding
4 A.2d 401 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
In Re Dorrance
170 A. 601 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1934)