PLAGGEMEYER v. Lee
This text of 773 N.W.2d 722 (PLAGGEMEYER v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James PLAGGEMEYER and Ruth Plaggemeyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Thomas LEE, Susan Lee, and Ryan E. Lee, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of McCormick v. Carrier (Docket No. 136738) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
YOUNG, J. (dissenting).
I would deny leave to appeal, for the reasons stated in Justice Corrigan's dissenting statement in McCormick v. Carrier, 485 Mich. ___, 770 N.W.2d 359, (Docket No. 136738, lv. gtd. order entered August 20, 2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
773 N.W.2d 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/plaggemeyer-v-lee-mich-2009.