Placido v. Gonzales

231 F. App'x 759

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in construing petitioners’ motion to reconsider as a motion to reopen and denying it as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.