Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State

DecidedJanuary 22, 2009

Docket13-08-00500-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State (Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00500-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

PLACIDO GUERRA A/K/A CHITO GUERRA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 138th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Placido Guerra a/k/a Chito Guerra, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 138^th District Court of Cameron, County, Texas, in cause no. 2008-04-2100-B. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 22nd day of January, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-08-00500-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

PLACIDO GUERRA A/K/A CHITO GUERRA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 138th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Placido Guerra a/k/a Chito Guerra, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 138^th District Court of Cameron, County, Texas, in cause no. 2008-04-2100-B. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 22nd day of January, 2009.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Placido Guerra A/K/A Chito Guerra v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/placido-guerra-aka-chito-guerra-v-state-texapp-2009.