Placement of Mentally Retarded Children
This text of 63 Pa. D. & C.2d 369 (Placement of Mentally Retarded Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first administrative appeal to the Secretary of Education of a due process hearing held pursuant to the amended consent agreement of the PARC Case raises the following question:
What are the duties of the Department of Public Welfare in regard to the placement of a child who has been certified by a school psychologist as being in need of a program which the public schools do not offer or who has been found by a hearing officer to be in need of a program which is available in a facility under the supervision or control of your department?
It is my opinion, and you are so advised, that the Department of Public Welfare must cooperate with the school entity involved in determining the placement of a child who has been certified by a school psychologist as being in need of a program which the public schools do not offer. Further, the department is under the legal obligation to place the child in accordance with the recommendations of a hearing officer when such recommendations are made.
[370]*370Under the terms of the court’s order, the Department of Public Welfare is a party defendant in the continuing implementation of the PARC consent agreement.1 In order to fulfill the department’s obligations under this order, the various segments of your department should be directed to confer with local education officials whenever a program under their auspices may be felt to be appropriate to the education and training needs of a particular child.
Secondly, when requested by local school officials, your department must assist in the preparation of information about and plans for a particular child whom that school entity proposes to place in a program in which your department is involved. It must be remembered that the Commonwealth’s obligation under the PARC case is first to find a public program for a child before turning to the private sector.
Also, when a hearing officer recommends that the child be placed in a program which is operated under the supervision or control of the Department of Public Welfare, all steps must be taken to immediately comply with that recommendation, including the actual placement of the child by the Department of Public Welfare. Such a placement must take into account the convenience to the child and his or her family, the nature of the facility and the availability of places in that facility.
The continued cooperation of your department, the local school districts, parents and children will demonstrate your concern for every child’s right to educational opportunities in Pennsylvania.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Pa. D. & C.2d 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/placement-of-mentally-retarded-children-paag-1973.