Place v. Estabrook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Place v. Estabrook

253 A.D. 828, 2 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8799

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The motion to amend the record and to grant reargument is referred to the court that rendered the decision on the appeal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ. Motion to amend record granted. Motion for reargument granted, and on reargument the decision of tills court handed down on November 19, 1937 [252 App. Div. 874], is adhered to for the additional reason that petitioner has not shown that his employment was legal in its inception. (Palmer v. Board of Education, 276 N. Y. 222, 225.) Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion to amend the record and to grant reargument is referred to the court that rendered the decision on the appeal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ. Motion to amend record granted. Motion for reargument granted, and on reargument the decision of tills court handed down on November 19, 1937 [252 App. Div. 874], is adhered to for the additional reason that petitioner has not shown that his employment was legal in its inception. (Palmer v. Board of Education, 276 N. Y. 222, 225.) Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Place v. Estabrook, 253 A.D. 828, 2 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 828 (Place v. Estabrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related