P.J.Q. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.J.Q. v. State

814 So. 2d 522, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 2002 WL 662909

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3188·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

P.J.Q., a juvenile, appeals an order withholding adjudication of delinquency. P.J.Q contends that the court erred in failing to delineate the length of the supervisory term imposed. As the state correctly concedes, P.J.Q. is entitled to relief. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for clarification of the supervisory term. On remand, if the court subjects P.J.Q. to its jurisdiction for a longer period than if adjudication of delinquency had been imposed, the court is “required to fully inform the juvenile of such facts.” N.W. v. State, 767 So.2d 446, 450 (Fla.2000).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

P.J.Q., a juvenile, appeals an order withholding adjudication of delinquency. P.J.Q contends that the court erred in failing to delineate the length of the supervisory term imposed. As the state correctly concedes, P.J.Q. is entitled to relief. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for clarification of the supervisory term. On remand, if the court subjects P.J.Q. to its jurisdiction for a longer period than if adjudication of delinquency had been imposed, the court is “required to fully inform the juvenile of such facts.” N.W. v. State, 767 So.2d 446, 450 (Fla.2000).

Reversed and remanded.

P.J.Q. v. State, 814 So. 2d 522, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 2002 WL 662909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

814 So. 2d 522 (P.J.Q. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related